Column by George B. Reed, Jr.: More inconvenient truth
Dec 09, 2012 | 2113 views | 3 3 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
George B. Reed, Jr.
George B. Reed, Jr.
slideshow
Many of us entertain the myth that Americans will act nobly and unselfishly during shortages and crises simply because it is the right thing to do. But looking back on our history, this appears to be just that, a myth. People generally have to be seduced, bribed or forced into doing something in the community or national interest. Our shabby record of cheating, black-marketing and profiteering during wartime, particularly during the Civil War and World War II, bears shameful witness to this fact.

When I was stationed in France in 1954 during the Korean War I was shocked that gasoline prices there were $0.85 per gallon when U. S, prices were around $0.21. Since the Europeans were paying essentially the same price per barrel of petroleum on the world market as we were, why were their gas prices at the pump so high?

The Europeans had realized after World War II that petroleum was a finite resource. They also realized that Persian Gulf oil supplies and prices could be manipulated by Middle-Eastern potentates for their own purposes. For this reason European governments developed a strategy of imposing high taxes on consumer fuel prices to force people to use public transportation, to drive smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles, to ride bicycles and (heaven forbid!) to walk more. As a result there were no two-block-long lines at the gas pumps in Europe during the 1973 OPEC oil embargo. But we elected not to use governmental initiatives to force energy conservation and we are paying for it. At present we are the only industrialized nation with no energy policy worthy of the name.

Republicans blame President Obama for the latest rise in fuel costs when it is mostly caused by Iran’s stepped-up nuclear intentions and increased demand from Japan and China. The recent recurrence of violence in the Gaza Strip hasn’t helped matters either. And this is the President’s fault?

Some Americans believe that the “self-corrective” free market could work out this energy problem to everyone’s benefit. That’s quaint and naïve. I was long ago sold on the idea that the capitalist free-market economy was the best system for providing the best quality socks, underwear, cars, toasters and root canals to the most people at the best prices. But the free market operates on incentives, and it has few incentives to conserve finite resources or to protect the environment. This must come from the people through their government.

The answer to our energy problems, I believe, is a redesign of our life styles to use less energy and to develop new alternative energy sources. But congressional Republicans have consistently blocked efforts to seriously explore either strategy.

There is another factor at work here that the main-stream media doesn’t always bring out, probably for good reason. Many of the GOP’s biggest contributors are heavily invested in oil, domestic and foreign. Running as deep as some of their off-shore wells are the Bush dynasty’s four-generational ties to oil. And where did Dick Cheney make his millions? While we’re on the subject of oil, how did it figure in George W.’s Iraq war? But that’s another topic.

We Americans seem obsessed today with talking about rights. But have we ever asked ourselves what right has a nation with only five percent of the world’s people and two percent of its oil reserves to consume twenty-five percent of the world’s energy and twenty percent of its oil? I won’t mention that we also produce forty-five percent of its carbon gases - I’m waiting.

George B. Reed, Jr. is retired from AT&T and a former history teacher in the Hamilton County school system. He lives in Fort Oglethorpe and can be reached at reed1600@bellsouth.net or 706-858-3501.

Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Moccasin
|
December 10, 2012
We have every right because we are the leaders of the free world. We have more untapped resources than the whole of the Middle East but our apologizer-in-chief has been ashamed of our wealth and prosperity since he was mentored by his Marxist friend growing up. That goes for anyone else in this nation that believes we should hold ourselves back. Progressiveness is a misnomer.

Bowing to other world leaders shows our weakness. They should be bowing to us for how great we are. We are the best in the world and if you do not believe that, try living in another country for awhile. I did for 12 years.
Frankenchrist
|
December 10, 2012
George, I wish to buy you a beer or sweet tea and listen to you talk for just half an hour. You have been the sharpest most knowlegeable human I have ever read. We differ in the last few months only on legalization.

Moc, I will go easy. Hold my self back, if you will. I am quite progressive, and am boggled as to why detaching ourselves from the Middle

Eastern (or specifically oil's) teat is bowing to other world leaders. Can't we be world leaders in conservation? Leaders in limitless solar, wind, geothermal etc? You want to regress to finite fossil fuels and show the world we can bully them all to get every last drop. I want to progress and show them we lead, they can follow. And it doesn't have to be on their knees worshipping the great USA.
Moccasin
|
December 27, 2012
I am for trying every option for energy as long as it does not take our tax money to fund it. The only reason alcohol gas is cheaper is because of subsidies. It is not as good as the real thing either. Why not create an incentive for a company to come up with a sustaining resource and reward them with a start-up tax break instead of giving them our money and watching them go belly-up like these 20 "green companies" that Obama has wasted our money on.

Until then, let's use our gas and oil instead of being held hostage by America-hating countries in the Middle-East.