Column by Tom McMahan: Using reason...and data
by Tom McMahan
Feb 02, 2013 | 1232 views | 1 1 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Tom McMahan
Tom McMahan
slideshow
Shootings like the one that occurred in Newtown are hard for any of us to make sense of, especially hard for someone like myself who is a teacher. I’ve since often thought of the ordeal faced by those small children and their teachers, and it’s difficult not to get angry when doing so. And that’s not the best state-of-mind to be in while trying to sort out what kind of response you’d like to see come out of the tragedy.

In the meantime, of course, there’s been a wide variety of responses, many of them thoughtful, some not so much. Can our own past be of any assistance? I think so, there’s at least one analogy we can draw from our recent history.

In the mid-twentieth century, the number of automobiles in America was rising rapidly, and with them the number of fatal accidents. As Americans began to grow alarmed by all the deaths, advocacy groups began to propose safety regulations. The car industry used its lobbying clout in state assemblies and congress to fight the changes. The industry argued that people were responsible for the deaths after all, not the cars, and therefore driver’s education would be the best approach.

Driver’s ed certainly was a good program. It’s a pity that budget cuts like the ones we’ve seen in Georgia have led to these programs virtually disappearing. But as more and more data was accumulated on the nature of car accidents, it became clearer that regulations were needed to force automobiles to be designed and used more safely, things like graduated licensing, seat-belt laws, requiring all drivers to have insurance, safety inspections, speed limits, and more recently mandatory air bag use. Looking back, it’s hard to imagine how much resistance there was to such efforts; I well remember as a child how few people used seat belts, some going as far as cutting the belts because they were “annoying” or because “no one was going to tell them to use them!”

Add to these efforts social movements like Mothers Against Drunk Drivers and we’ve seen, over time, the number of fatalities per capita drop significantly from car accidents. Car accidents still happen all the time, unfortunately, and people do continue to die, but given how many cars and people there are using them now, the deaths in the accidents that happen have grown statistically far fewer in number.

And, no one’s had their cars taken away from them as a result.

So, I believe the reasonable 90+ percent of our population can find answers to the exact causes of gun-related deaths like Newtown that don’t involve banning guns on one extreme, or the outright denial of the need to do anything by people forever living out “Red Dawn” paranoid fantasies on the other extreme.

The best first step is to simply start collecting thorough data on all gun-related deaths so we know exact causes and develop preventive measures to stop them. Such data is out there but its scattered and scarce thanks to lobbying by the gun industry which has sought, irrationally, to prevent its collection.

We also have to carefully figure out ways to limit access to guns by people who have certain mental illnesses. This is much easier said than done, but we have to find ways to do it. Two dozen dead 5- and 6-year-olds, along with some of their teachers, requires us to do nothing less.

Tom McMahan is a public school teacher in Catoosa County and the Chair of the Dade County Democratic Committee. He can be reached at dadedemocrat@gmail.com.

Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
IrishRed
|
February 03, 2013
Well said Mr. McMahon. I have heard that they want to cross reference mental health records with background checks. However, very few states have done this. It seems that many of the shooters have had mental issues of some kind and maybe this along with thorough background checks at gun shows might stop some of this. It doesn't stop someone from stealing a gun but putting up a few blocks to getting a gun might help. It would also help if ammunition were not so readily available on line. No one needs hundreds of rounds of ammo for a legitimate purpose.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.