Ringgold reconsidering WiFi at children’s park in wake of citizen concerns
by Adam Cook
Aug 31, 2012 | 3455 views | 11 11 comments | 13 13 recommendations | email to a friend | print
After initially approving the endeavor, the Ringgold council will wait to make a decision on whether to install WiFi at the Little General Children’s Park and city pool. (Catoosa News photo/Adam Cook)
After initially approving the endeavor, the Ringgold council will wait to make a decision on whether to install WiFi at the Little General Children’s Park and city pool. (Catoosa News photo/Adam Cook)
slideshow
A voting technicality a couple of weeks ago has given the Ringgold City Council time to reevaluate its initial inclination to install WiFi at the Little General Children’s Park, while also fielding concerns from citizens regarding the endeavor.

At the Aug. 14 meeting, the council voted to approve the project, but did so while shorthanded, as mayor Joe Barger was having hip surgery in Birmingham and vice-mayor Randall Franks was in Canada on a music tour.

With Barger and Franks out of town, council member Terry Crawford was elected to chair the meeting that saw council members Nick Millwood and Earl Henderson vote to approve the matter, while council member G. Larry Black was opposed.

With three votes in favor needed to ratify anything at a meeting, and the WiFi agenda item met with only a 2-1 vote, the council was prompted to put it back on the agenda for the most recent meeting, which was this past Monday, Aug. 27.

In that two-week time span, Crawford and city manager Dan Wright say that numerous citizens expressed their displeasure with the idea of equipping the park with WiFi, which is a wireless connection to the internet for mobile devices such as cell phones, tablets and laptops.

“At the last meeting, those of us that were here approved the item, but we didn’t have the three consecutive votes we actually needed,” Crawford said. “Since that night, I have been contacted by 17 to 18 people who have expressed their concerns about this project.”

Crawford said that in the two weeks since the last meeting, he has had time to consider the issue from both sides.

“Had I voted last meeting, I probably would have voted in favor of it, even though my wife stood up in the meeting and stated she wasn’t in favor of it,” he said. “But after talking with different people in the community, I can understand the concerns and I see both sides of the issue.”

One concerned citizen, Jenilee Lemmon, insists that installing WiFi would not only distract people from keeping a close eye on their children, but would also entice sexual predators to visit the park.

“The children should come first,” Lemmon said. “If people are on their computers, then they won’t be watching the kids. It would be the equivalent of texting while driving. It would also give sexual predators the opportunity to find and make friends with their next victims. The WiFi shouldn’t be in a place that could create danger for our citizens and children. … Having the internet there is just going to cause problems.”

Lemmon’s concerns were not lost on the council, especial Earl Henderson, who first brought up the idea.

“I never thought that this item would turn into what it has turned into,” Henderson said. “I really appreciate Ms. Lemmon’s passion. … All I ask is that we stay open-minded about this issue rather than fight about it. Maybe we can come to some sort of compromise.”

Mayor Barger and council member Black both avidly opposed the item, with the feeling that there isn’t a gray area with certain issues.

“Why should we compromise the safety of our children?” Barger asked.

“There are some things that you just can’t compromise,” Black added.

Millwood and Franks both seemed to be on board with Henderson in favor of the idea.

“Not everyone goes to the park with kids,” Franks said. “By not having it (WiFi) there, we would be eliminating a part of the city’s population from going to the park. Some people don’t have children.”

With the cons of the scenario dominating most of the conversation, the council’s two newest members, Henderson and Millwood, put a lot of effort into proposing a compromise or alternative.

“We’ve heard a lot about the negative aspects of this tonight, and I feel like we should think more about solutions instead of just focusing on the problems,” Millwood said.

“The more we choose to work together, the better we’ll be able to enhance our city moving forward,” Henderson added.

At night’s end, the council voted to table the WiFi item to allow time to conduct research on possible alternative public locations with the intention of putting the item back on the agenda in the future.

The council unanimously approved the following items during the meeting:

· The rollback of the 2012 millage (property tax) rate to 2.680 from 2.707.

· The mayor checking with the Methodist Church to see if the church still owns the cemetery at LaFayette and Church Streets next to Flora Lawrence’s residence.

· To accept the interpretive marker from the Georgia Civil War Commission to be installed at the Cleburne Monument.

· To approve the Ringgold Youth Athletic Association (RYAA) agreement.

· The intergovernmental agreement with Catoosa County for adding the city’s alcohol referendums to the ballot in the November election.

· The Downtown Development Authority (DDA) purchasing a Christmas tree to be placed in the downtown triangle park near the digital sign.

· The council voted to allocate $250,000 to the DDA and of that $250,000, $30,000 is to be used to hire a part-time person for the DDA.

The next regularly scheduled Ringgold City Council meeting will be held at City Hall at 7 p.m. on Monday, Sept. 10, with a work session slated to take place beforehand at 6 p.m.

Comments
(11)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
catoosarez
|
September 03, 2012
Have you noticed how many are using Internet in Hamilton county then coming to Ringgold to"meet" their victim?? Having Internet in the park will not increase the risk that already exists.
geno36
|
August 31, 2012
South Pittsburg has had free Wifi through out there intire city for years and i haven't heard on any increase in sexual predators or kids being snached away. Its no more distracting than texting or talking on there phones the whole time they are at the park. Some don't even get out of there car while there kids are playing. Don't want to miss that chance to win free stuff on the radio i guess, or its too hot for then to get out of the car.
iomike
|
August 31, 2012
Helicopter mom needs to fly to another real issue instead this phony issue.
WalkerCoCitizen
|
August 31, 2012
I don't live in your county, but I thought I'd chime in. I'm an IT professional as well and would find it very useful to have wifi in the park. The arguments posed against having are far reaching from people who don't quite understand technology. I was waiting for someone to pose the argument that it was too costly, which would have been understandable. McDonalds, Panera, the Bouncy place in Fort Oglethorpe (can't think of the name) all have wifi and have not become any greater risk than what they already were.
Gatorfan
|
August 31, 2012
They should ban books too! How dare those parents read at the park when they should be watching their kids. I always like it when someone else is telling me how to keep an eye on my kid. And a pedophile can get a cheap smartphone with 3G and be connected to the internet from anywhere. The concerns these people have expressed are ridiculous. Bring on the wi-fi so I don't have to use up the data on my iPhone while my kids play!
Frankenchrist
|
August 31, 2012
Ban bicycles. Kids ride bikes outside, molesters can grab the kids. Ban schools. Kids congregate at schools and molesters can snag them to and from schools or even IN schools. Ban restaurants that allow kids. The kids can go to the restrooms there and get molested.

The park doesn't have wi-fi? Whew. No kid will get perved out on at a park as long as there is no wi-fi.

This may be extreme, but so is the rationale for no wi-fi at a park. If you want to save $, just say so.
CCRES40
|
August 31, 2012
Frankenchrist, give me one good reason why you need Wi-Fi at a park designed for children to play on.
Gatorfan
|
August 31, 2012
CCRES40 my job requires me to be on-call one week out of the month. Meaning if there is a computer issue at the office then I have to connect in with my laptop and fix the issue. It would be great to have wi-fi at the park so I can take my laptop while the kids play and if I do get a call I can get connected. Wi-fi isn't a bad thing people. Welcome to the 21st century.
BigBrother123
|
August 31, 2012
Sounds to me like you are to cheap to buy an air card for your computer and want the city to pick the tab for internet.
CCRES40
|
September 04, 2012
When I take my kids to the park. I'm with them the whole time. Work be damned. While you're "fixing" problems at the office a pervert is dragging your kid into the bushes or behind a piece of equipment. When you're out with your kids, your attention is on your kids 100% of the time. If your office can't afford you 30 minutes to an hour to spend with your family unintterupted, find another job.
Gatorfan
|
September 04, 2012
Yeah let me quit my job because I can't go to the park with the kids without my laptop. You obviously know soo much about me and my family. And yes I would get so distracted that I would allow someone to drag my kids into the bushes. Give me a break! Don't tell me how to watch my kids. Worry about your own kids not mine. You people are ridiculous.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.