Walker County judge dismisses traffic cases as one-time act of kindness
by Christi McEntyre
Aug 06, 2012 | 4093 views | 4 4 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Walker County State Court judge Bruce Roberts had a moment of generosity in his traffic court Friday morning, Aug. 3.

Fifty-three cases that normally would have been fined were thrown out by the judge in what he called a spur-of-the-moment decision.

“I’ve never done that ever,” he said. “The election was over and I thought it would be a nice gesture, sort of an amnesty thing.”

Roberts was appointed as the Walker County state court judge by Gov. Nathan Deal in September 2011. He ran for re-election in non-partisan primary on July 31 and lost to challenger Billy Mullinax.

“I can serve until December 31,” said Roberts, who reiterated that his dismissal of Friday’s cases was just a one-time action, and that traffic violators should not expect the same leniency to occur at a later date.

“People who come to Walker County should not be expecting that to ever happen again,” said Roberts.

Roberts’s actions were perfectly legal – “a judge can dismiss a case any time that they want to,” he said – though he doubts his successor will ever repeat the gesture.

“I seriously doubt that judge Mullinax will ever do that,” he said. “This was just my first arraignment after the election...I thought it would be a nice thing to do for the people.”

The cases thrown out represented a wide variety of traffic violations, including 19 speeders and 10 motorists without insurance. All 53 cases were those of violators who would have otherwise pleaded guilty; anyone who pleaded not guilty or would have needed a jury trial at a later date was not granted clemency.

Although individual monetary fines would normally have been set on a case-by-case basis by Judge Roberts and therefore the total amount of fines that will not be collected cannot be calculated, OCGA 36.15 states that the minimum court cost per case is $50. At bare minimum, $2,650 in court fines and fees will not be collected for the county. A more realistic estimate is at least twice that number.

“Every fine in Georgia has add-ons and surcharges,” said Roberts, part of which goes toward county coffers.

Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Bonnet
|
August 09, 2012
We need a judge like this in Catoosa County.

A little more mercy is needed but it is not in the DNA of Georgia " justice", only this rare instance.

Bet ya this group of offenders will be more careful in the future than those who have been put upon.
cookie47monster
|
August 06, 2012
I congratulate the good citizens of Walker County for not letting this 'Judge' judge.

I speculate he may run for this office again and have only 53 votes. This would also be good.

Nathan, shame on you !
can'tstandit
|
August 06, 2012
Here's the way it works. The previous judge and the next judge are good golfing buddies. The system used to be that for about $2500, the previous judge reduced your DUI charge providing you had an attorney. The county LOVED this arrangement because the money came in and the jail was not overburdened with the cost of housing the drunk drivers. Judge Roberts came in and put an end to the wholesale reduction of DUIs and the commish and others were not happy. He was never part of the good-old-boy system and that meant he had to go. So, the sheriff who had recently endorsed Judge Roberts in a letter to Governor Deal, openly campaigns with and for Mr. Mullinax. There are ethical questions everywhere in Walker County and short of the citizens pulling their heads out of the sand, it will never change.

Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.