Les Coffey is wanted for a felony charge of criminal damage to property in the second degree, a felony charge of escape, and a misdemeanor charge of damaging, injuring or interfering with property of public utility companies, municipalities or political subdivisions. Description: White male, 43 years old (born Sept. 16, 1967), brown hair, brown eyes, 5 feet 10 inches and 240 pounds. The Walker County Sheriff’s Office can offer a reward for information if it leads to an arrest. The reward amount is based on the nature of the crime(s) involved. If anyone has any information on a “Most Wanted” person, contact the Sheriff’s Office during business hours at (706) 638-1909; on weekends and after hours call the non-emergency 911 number at (706) 375-7810.
So I may write like an idiot and the lack of grammar may hurt my credibility. The truth is I am just a tad but smarter than my writings give me credit for.
Corpsewood was built in the 1970’s. Peerless was built in the early 1900’s. Comparing these two buildings makes about as much sense as accusing Coffee of being LU.
If you wish to continue posting outlandish comparisons in an attempt prove your point please find something viable. May I suggest you research a building destroyed in the Chicago fire in 1871 or the General Motors fire in 1953. These might add some creditability to our argument.
Just out of curiosity do you not think the building will be checked out by the proper personnel after the fire? It is their job to determine if the building is safe. This is not the job for someone who wishes they had authority and were an expert and in investigation, legal matters, scientific experimentation, and building inspector.
If I get on television and say that I am an alien does that make it fact??? Of course it doesn’t. You have to back what you say with facts and indisputable evidence to be taken seriously. Please do so! This is becoming very tiresome.
The only person that you are managing to convince that Coffey is LU Lafayette is yourself. I have read enough from the both of them to know that they have completely different writing styles. Also, while LU is articulate and uses proper grammar and spelling, Coffey unabashedly butchers the English language, and his comments are often incoherent and riddled with spelling/typing errors.
As a matter of fact, sandman, your comments, which are difficult to read because of a singular run-on paragraph containing nothing but baseless allegations, resemble Coffey's writing style more than LU Lafayette's. Wow! Sandman, are you and Coffey actually the same person? See, I can play detective, too!
Now,if that isn't proof enough that Mr Coffey is LaFayette Underground (L.U. LaFayette) I don't know what is.Now,considering the fact that on his personal Facebook Mr Coffey has NOT said any derogatory,harassing or otherwise prevoking comments in regards to the City of Rossville, it boggles my mind why Mr Coffey didn't immeadiately seek a lawsuit on the basis of slander and defamation of character and/or slander.
As for the subject of the fire, sorry but time stamped and tamper proof archives from the 911 center and/or Rossville Fire Department is evident that this imaginary story of the Rossville Fire Department taking an hour to begin Fire Fighting proceedures.Let along the concrete slab test that I am STILL waiting to see. That test and that test alone would prove that the structural integrity of his building would be absolutely unfit, if still totally standing at all.To prove this,go to any article you can find about Corpsewood Manor infamous for the murders at Taylors Ridge in Chattooga County. That place was set a blaze shortly after the murders that took place there,the exterior was made of Brick and that place burned to the ground .And you're going to try to convince me that a building of similar materials burned for a couple hours and didn't sustain ANY harsh structural integrity? Please,I was born.....just not yesterday.
You said
First and foremost, I STRONGLY feel that this man was responsible for setting fire to his own "business establishment" or my apologies; the builidng that he owns.
In my opinion Mr Coffey somehow rigged this blow torch up, or had someone to do so, exited the building and then all hellfire and brimstone went loose from there. And I dare anyone to attempt to show me proof otherwise.
You've NEVER seen "me" on "L.U." except for the fact that you ARE L.U. and I know I can prove it
Mr Coffey, I have more education in the tip of my thumb nail than you have in your entire brain.
These are statements that you made that you can’t back up with fact. The burden of proof is on you not on Coffey. When Coffey made the statement that the fire trucks did not arrive fast enough then he must prove that in court.
Attempting to communicate with someone that is obsessed with wording statements so they feel they can’t be held accountable and constantly drops back to a 3rd grade mentality to dare someone to provide fact has become tiring to me.
It is impossible to defeat a man who refuses to admit his errors by argument.
You had an opportunity to prove what you thought and get paid for doing so.
I will quote you on this one. “You've NEVER seen "me" on "L.U." except for the fact that you ARE L.U. and I know I can prove it.”
Still waiting.
If you manage complete that task then you can go to work on proving that I am Coffey.
Happy Hunting
You consistently make wild accusations which have no merit. You wish to appear as a detective, legal expert, and now building inspector. You have accused Coffey of being LaFayette Underground. You have insinuated that he set fire to his own building. Now you would suggest that he attempt to rebuild on a slab that lacks structural integrity. May I suggest or we can go back to 3rd grade and I will double dog dare you to provide merit to you assumptions. If you can not do so then drop it.
It was accidental caused by a torch
We did not have water to the fire hydrant
The fire department was slow to respond
Any of these three things is not the cause of the substantial damage but a combination of the three.
Had we had water to the hydrant we would not have needed the fire department. Had they responded timely and sent adequate equipment the damages would not be as great
The reason the building is still standing is because that section is 100% concrete.
The various insurance companies will sort it out and us debating things is a waste of time.
I FEEL the reasons that have been given are about a ludicrous as I’ve ever heard. I don’t THINK a motive was ever given. It would only APPEAR that you hold a grudge against Coffey and FEELINGS can SOMETIMES cloud the facts.
I thought that you may actually have some information about the fire since it has received very little media coverage. I was obviously incorrect.
Having cut fuel tanks in the past I have witnessed how easily they can blow while being cut. We always filled them with water before we started and sometimes they would still blow out. No one was ever killed by one of these explosions, but I will say that underwear was changed a few times.
The fire occurred at a metal recycling facility. This facility like many others accepts junk cars. Most cars (especially junk cars) would have been powered by some type of flammable fuel source. I don’t understand why it would be so hard to believe that a fire started while cutting a car into manageable pieces. The fire seemed to be reported in a reasonable time.
Are you saying his motive was insurance or was he just trying to prove a point.
Please let me know why you feel so strongly.