Letter to the editor: Vitriolic rhetoric hurts, not helps, our country
Nov 17, 2012 | 4590 views | 8 8 comments | 59 59 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Dear editor,

In his column “Survivor nation: Can we protect ourselves from Obama and those who elected him?,” Jeff O'Bryant uses blustery, vitriolic rhetoric to prescribe survival of his apocalyptic description of the next four years.

By using phrases like “take matters into our own hands,” he furtively describes an America where people must take up arms against a horde of 61,170,405 irresponsible people who claw at the property of those who really earned it. If this is the future of the America that Mr. O’Bryant honestly sees, one whose “greatness is no more,” he should look closer. The same political principles and institutions that have existed since the founding of this country are still alive and well.

I have identified as a Republican since I could vote. Mr. O”Bryant does not speak for me or many other Republicans. To be sure, many will agree with his outlook. I not only disagree, but I abhor the tone used by Mr. O’Bryant and many of my fellow conservatives of late. It seems like Republicans have acted as if being anti-Obama requires being anti-hope since 2008, when his heavy use of the words “hope” and “change” swept him into office. It is time to move on. To languish in frustration and promote fear does nothing to move the country forward. It does reinforce what critics of conservatives and Republicans dislike most about us.

In a time when our country needs statesmanship, will we instead urge anger toward and fear of our fellow Americans? Gov. Romney, for whom I voted, recently suggested that the President won re-election by giving “gifts” to those who voted for him. He used the word “gift” to mean the same thing as Mr. O’Bryant uses the words “free stuff.” Mr. O’Bryant goes a step further in calling on people to “protect" their property from the irresponsible ones. Our problems are not so easily solved. Such rhetoric hurts, not helps, our country.

The election is over. Our nation faces difficult crises ahead, including an impending fiscal cliff, an immigration policy in need of reform and a world that requires strong leadership. The way forward is to offer solutions by relying on our deeply rooted conservative principles: freedom, stability and steady progress. We inherited these principles, and our call is to pass them on. These principles deserve standard bearers who do not marginalize their audience with extreme positions and who will not deepen the disagreements between their countrymen.

Matt Williamson, LaFayette

Comments
(8)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Moccasin
|
December 10, 2012
Just because 48% of the country voted that is ok to steal money from the other 51% does not mean we should just move on and pretend to be a good loser. Something is wrong with the minds of people who think this is ok. I would like a fair election where only tax-payers are allowed to vote in elections and make voting a privilege to work toward.
Frankenchrist
|
December 10, 2012
You sound like a dictator Mr Moc. Is that how you think? Is that style of rule you idealize? You scare the crap out of me and every other sane American. Sadly, I see latinguy, Conrad, and Rearden do not belong in the ranks of the sane either. If Satan were real, I'd still be more afraid of RWNJ's.
Moccasin
|
December 27, 2012
Frank, no sir. A dictator would not let people vote or forces people to vote a certain way. The voting process I propose allows the WORKING class (you know, the ones that feed the other 47%) to make the representative decisions.

I lived very close to China and Vietnam for 12 years, I know first hand how Socialism, Communism and Democracy work. I prefer a Democratic Republic like our Constitution intended.

vox.vocis.vel.causa
|
November 19, 2012
Dear Matt,

I truly wish the way forward was to offer solutions but, unfortunately, the left in America is becoming increasingly hostile to solutions that make any sense at all. The rhetoric is a natural outgrowth from people who see their way of life (that is to say, prosperity) slipping away. We have to fight back. Offering words no longer works. Washington is broken. The founders set it up to where it wouldn't be easy for any one group to dominate the other- and there is wisdom in that. But we have reached a point to where virtually one half of the country is in a face off against the other. Since conservative principles offer a way out, they have to be pursued. And if that means fighting every inch and using every possible tactic necessary to achieve those ends, then so be it. I respect your view, but while you stand and speak, you should consider action as perhaps a more optimal route to victory. It's sad, but it's reality.
ConradCA
|
November 19, 2012
President Obama is a tyrant and oath breaker. He swore an oath to up hold the constitution and has without a doubt violated that oath.

He made recess appointments when Congress was not in recess. That is a violation of the Constitution.

He modified US laws which is a power only granted to the Congress. He created a dream act in violation of the Constitution. He also decided he could grant states waivers to the work requirements of US welfare requirements which is also in violation of the constitution.

There is no doubt that tyrant Obama took these actions and no doubt that they are in violation of the Constitution. He is guilty of treason and violation of his oath of office. Every American should be demanding his ouster and imprisonment.
rearden1
|
November 18, 2012
At what point do we fight back? At what point do we at last realize that the prosperity we enjoy and previously believed we would pass on to our children is being threatened by what is... searching for a word I can only come up with negative ones like dark... a dark force that cannot be reasoned with, that is so convinced of its own rightness that ignores the evidence of what out of control spending, the debt, and the deficit are doing to not just our future but our children and their children's future. O'Bryant's outrage is not only justified but necessary. It should burn in the hearts of any who love America and her people. I would not say free stuff so much but rather that Obama supporters are like children- and as the adults in the room it's our responsibility to not let them destroy themselves. Just as we teach children (the whole point of schools is so they will gain both the social and practical skills to function in a job) we have to teach, it seems, half the nation that self-reliance isn't a racial slur but a way of life. That a parasite will eventually kill its host. And when we have a system that allows - even encourages - people to never get a job what other term but parasite can you use? And no, for those that are disabled and can't help it I have no ill-will, animosity, or desire to not help them. But we must see that when 49 percent of American households - households in a land with more opportunity than any other place on earth - receive government assistance then something, somewhere, is wrong. Any number of factors could contribute to this- and they are factors we can identify and address. But just throwing more money at the problem isn't an answer. We need a clear plan to reduce social welfare. Just "asking" the wealthy to pay more isn't the answer.
IrishRed
|
November 18, 2012
After listening to Mitt Romney after the election, I see where all of this is coming from. Fortunately there are people like Chris Christie, Bobby Jindal and Newt Gingrich who have stepped up and condemned this kind of rhetoric. Mr. O'Bryant would do well to pay attention to these people. I did not agree with them politically but in this respect they make sense. We do not need to further divide the country by saying these types of things.
akstrongheart
|
November 17, 2012
Well said Mr. Williamson
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.